"Warning: Exposure to violent video games has been linked to aggressive behavior"
This is the phrase that congressmen Joe Baca and Frank Wolf
wanted to see on the vast majority of video games with the bill that they attempted to pass. The bill in question is named 'The Violence in Video Games Labeling Act,
H.R. 4204' - at least they're honest and outright with the name, I guess.
Part way into reading the article, I realised that the branding would be on all interactive video game media on the market - and the only titles exempt from this classification are those that have been rated EC (or Early Childhood) by the US Video Game rating board, the
ESRB. This means that so many games, that while are not for younger children due to their level of complexity or themes, will be branded with a message relating to the link between violent content and aggressive behavior - regardless of whether or not the game actually has any violent content in the first place.
Now - you'd tell me that's absurd, right? I'd tell you the same. However, the fact that they're even considering creating a bill that affects the video game industry in a fashion such as this is odd, especially since
studies that link aggressive behavior to violent video games actually don't have much grounding (come on now, 329 people is not exactly a wide study).
|
'Cooking Mama' would have to bear a warning about violence and aggression, because it rated 'E'. |